25 Nov 2021. The difficulty with linguistics and language in explaining technical issues. (Schumann Resonance FB group)
Thank you all for being here. If you're reading this, thank you.
If you're new here, welcome. Everyday we're getting new people. As part of my experience in the 3 years I've dedicated to exclusively explaining the SR (along with associated atmospheric electromagnetics); I've come to understand the variety of reasons why people come here, and the other SR-related group and Youtube channel I manage.
Some folks are here for "ascension"; some for the reason that they just want to learn about the Earth/planet/natural systems. Some are here because they feel there's a natural, magical quality to 7.8Hz, and they want to uncover the secrets behind the magic.
It's been discussed here, and elsewhere, the role of belief in research on SR/associated atmospheric electro-magnetics. There's a high degree of belief behind the motivation for many (the majority ?) coming here to learn how this works. Belief is not the problem. Using science, or a scientific graph to support the belief is the core issue.
Do as you want. It's all by choice.
I'm not here to dissuade any beliefs, nor is anyone here looking to topple any belief systems, nor religions. This group was not started as a place where we are discussing the spiritual/religious value of the spectrogram as "the Schumann."
As a technician, I have over 40 years in "the field" of audio, video, electronics, computer repair, radio/television broadcasting, working live concerts as a sound guy, working on digital capture systems, and on the list goes... even if it's just volunteering at the local public tv studio to assist in the studio as an extra cameraman.
I've spent alot of time in the field working, in addition to technical and vocational training in the theory behind all that stuff, so I know the 'entirety' of how the computer mainframe and servers work, and how the network as "as a whole" functions, in addition to having to slave through learning javascript (which no one should ever have to, unless you're working on it, but whtvr).
You could rightly call me a journeyman, or certainly a tradesman. There's a certain work ethic, an attitude, collaborative spirit that comes from working with a crew of guys, all geared towards a singleness of purpose. The tradesmen have a language, and a manner of conveying information that's paired to the work itself, along with the tools necessary to do the job. We have similar training. Accordingly, we can help elevate, and educate our peers on the uniquness of each job as it comes along; because some of us understand the theory a little more comprehensively than our peers. Yet, there's physical aspects to the job that some guys are just better at.
In the lab environment, there is a certain protocol, training and conditioning necessary to fully understand the situation of the laboratory.
In some settings, people can, and have gotten hurt in electrical/ atomic experiments gone awry. Safety is a huge concern in alot of these settings. Safety comes through awareness. Mindfullness in noticing small differences in the material sometimes. Knowing when the material is about to transform catestrophically is an important part of safety. Noticing when a seemingly inconsequential source of heat is next to a combustible compound.
Mindfullness, and attention to detail are two import elements to onsite safety, so that we all get to go home at the end of the day.
What's this have to do with Schumann resonances?
The protocol to keep the data intact, like a safety switch.
The problem is that the Schumann resonances are invisible. There's lots of job hazards that are invisible. One first task is to make visible the invisible.
This is the job of the spectrogram.
Yet, there's a huge section of this discussion that is no longer secured through an actual experience; yet it is unsecured, invisible. Much of the belief system that folks arrive here with is actually a detriment to their clear, safe understanding of what the atmospheric phenomena is.
I use the word "safe" to make a sidewards nod to those folks who are prone to spastic behaviour over the spikes on the spectrogram.
Words themselves can be the invisible hazard; due to the logical concepts held by a person in the head.
The hardest part of speaking is breaking apart from the idea that what you say is absolute in meaning. The meaning of conversation with humans was broken apart from what we speak. I have previously discussed the tragedy of the Tower Of Babel.
The meaning is not in the word itself, but how it's stated. This is how the heart communicates. It's not what you say, but how you say it.
Yet, this is not how science, technology, math, engineering, law work, the nuances of meaning between the definitions is a never-ending pursuit. Pure logic is a hamster on a wheel the ceaselessly works to catch its tail symbolically.
Schematically-speaking, that dynamic looks like a linear progression, escalating in frequency.
One of the principles of physics that I have discussed is that as the frequency increases, the wave/signal becomes increasingly directional. This also includes brain frequency activity. As the thinking/processing/deliberative-side engages, electric-side activity increases; brain wave frequency increases. Higher frequencies are increasingly directional. This is the logical, reasoning, rationalizing process in action. Intuitive-side activity decreases.
Intuitive-side is predominently magnetic transmission, of lower frequency, to allow for more onmi-directional transmission.
Collective consciousness is closer to an "unconsciousness", due to the lower frequencies involved in the transmission of the intuitive signals.
Language is not natural.
Not with all the rules, and exceptions, and grammatical correctness necessary to logical transmit ideas through language. High frequency activity moves logic, reasoning, rationalizing, deliberation; techniques necessitating narrowing-down the field of that which it is not.
Mouth noises are fairly common among mammals. We use these noises to express a wide range of intentions. Intonation, or HOW something is said is more important to heart-to-heart communication.
Phoneme is the most basic unit of sound. Birds chirping create phonemes. Sound itself is an emotional expression from within.
Phoenics is the system of "sound it out"; phonemes strung together to form complex vibrations of sounds, into roughly intelligent assembleges. This is a system of converting sound into a written language.
American Sign Language is the de facto standard for hand gesture-based language. The Meru Foundation proposes that sign language, and a physical manifestation of the body (body language) is able to convey complex meaning. Humans posses such a thing called "muscle memory." this is where the body itself is able to perform tasks, simply from the stored memory of the cellular network of the genes. Meru Foundation, which studies Hebrew language, maintains that the Hebrew alphabet is a visual representation of hand shapes, and a visual language predating a written one.
Again, 93+% of what makes you "you" is shared by ALL organic life on the planet. The intuitive-side is 93+% of the physical container, within which we experience life in Earth School.
Dance, movement, non-hand gesture (mudra)-centric is an other related means of communicating information. Yet this tends to be of a more basic, lower vibrational intention; onmi-directionally radiating the communication for all to see. It becomes our personal, emotional, feeling/magnetic-side activity; it is heart-centered activity.
Song connects us emotionally in a way that language does not. There are multiple layers, or levels of intention involved in auditorily, through sound, transmit ideas. The mono-tone necessary for technical explanations is not given to song, nor dance.
Gesture is a visual experience, intended to convey a physical meaning, from one to another, Words, talking, language can be a "gesture", such as a prefunctory "how ya doin?" when you greet a person one may know.
There is a verbal inflection, a "gesture" that comes in the transmission of words. The basic "how ya doin'" may be warm, perfunctory, or combative...whatever attitude the speaker wants to convey.
A lexicon is a sub-set of vocabulary. Language as a written form of communication among the population is a fairly new invention. The printing press in the 1660's is at first seen as the advent of the Aquarean Age, yet it is a mechanical invention that formalized, regmented the written word, for mass-consumption. Before the printing press, most common-folk could not read. Script was handwriting, which was used by record keepers, scholars, scribes, and clergy. That's it. What is there to read, when all the knowledge is conveyed through physical gesture, and muscle-memory.
Any mathmaticians would have their own means of keeping track of their equations and figurings on parchment, with quill pen, and ink.
With the missing of handworked script, and the ability for the hands to "dance", so to speak, the creative-intuitive-side goes dormant. The emotional content in the speaking moves to talking, which is of the mindless variety of speaking. Talkiong tends to be a repetition, or regurgitation of facts memorized.
As i have mentioned before, there's a difference between talking, and speaking. Part of it is in the intention. Yet the bigger portion of the difference lay in the fact that sharing comes from the heart, the magnetic-side, moving laterally from me to you. Sign language, script, or hand gestures, are an extremely important part of transmitting information successfully, among people.
Yet, printing-press based knowledge factors out this necessity. There is a portion of effective communication that is devoid, based on the types of hand gestures, along with the shapes, and geometry of the words as a cohesive whole. A proper manuscript (scrolls) need to be reviewed first--then interprated.
So, how does this relate to properly reading the Schumann Resonances spectrogram?
Let's move back to the spiritual angle. Many folks are coming here, into the curiosity of the SR, with the intention of locating the spiritual essence.
With what I've said about language, we look at the Spectrogram. There is the transliteration of the data on the scope, from the actual detector itself. Based on the proper training, and experiential, hands-on work with the spectrogram, one understand how to read the colorful results. There is the actual, technical meaning of the graph, based upon the substance of the actual antennae detector units.
It's fairly straight-forwards to explain how the spectrogram works, if one's mind has not been contaminated first with the spiritual & religious version of interpolation. In lack of cellular memory, an alternate explanation (song and dance) is added.
The electric-side is the deliberative/processing section of brain activity; it is in essence formless, shapeless. Words as sounds have an emotional content to them. Ultimately we sense what we say, yet this does not mean that the words are anchored in anything substantial, or meaningful.
Without the benefit of having hands-on experience with the spectrogram, one is inclined towards imaginary explanations to justify the incipient belief, coming into this space.
I've discussed this previously, for its own reasons. It is its own discussion of people who interperate the spectrogram, from a belief system; not from the actual technical explanation.
Simply speaking, the spiritual interpretation was introduced into the collective narrative with the intention of confounding the understanding of the phenomena.
If there is a spiritual value to it, this is neither proven, nor validated through misappropriation (theft) of the spectrogram image. Additionally, were there a spiritual value to the spectrographic information, one has successfully nullified it by misrepresenting the data, declaring the mystery picture to be something it's not.
Logic is a tool; not a destination.
Increasing in frequency imposes a directionality; logic to thinking-side activity. Frequency becomes a velocity (straight-line vector), as logic becomes directed.
Like the ever-increasing hamster, the frequency escalates. This is not ascension, nor the collective consciousness at work. Increasing frequency divigates into the logical-side. Logic is simply a directed sense, geared at processing mental-sensory data. It deliberates from what has been sensed-into the thought forms of mind.
The starting point for the logical process might start at any point, even an emotional/intuitional sense.
Logic is a tool. It is a means of arriving at a conclusion, or resolution of sensory data. It's job is to neatly, tightly resolve sensory data into "digestable" thought forms. Largely, this is for the sake of sanity, and mental stability. Logic and clear mental processing is imperative to getting out of a given situation, or for arriving at a solution elegantly, and efficiently.
Logic itself does not act in a vacuum. The brain material is like a sponge. The basis of all our thinking, reality, and existence is kept intact through the proteins and sugars of the dna, and some electro-chemical activity, some hormones, and that's life. Amazing stuff, indeed.
So, as concrete as we might logic, and clear, rational thinking to be, how "all that" we look for it to be, we still are left with the organic nature of thinking, and memory storage.
How we file personal experiences matter to how we retrieve these later, as needed. Intelligence is not simply a matter of what one has learned/remembered, but equally how well the brain has assimilated, and filed the experiential content.
Memories are stored more securely if the 3 elements are met: words/symbols, song/intonation, dancing/movement-hand-eye-coordination. Printed linotype is the most difficult to memorize and assimilate, therefore store for later retrieval.
Learning the technical and engineering explanation of how the spectrogram works, and how to properly read it is a rather time-consuming, thought-intensive undertaking.
The Disney-version of the narrative is a "EZ Bake Oven" assemblage of factoids, pseudo-science and wishful-thinking.
Truth is arrived at through agreement. Reality is what happens when that agreement fails.
Truth is essentially determined by "peer review". This is agreement by a group of one's peers; who are those who are similarly trained, conditioned and linguistically experienced.
Two or more, sharing a philosophy or belief can agree on a massive set of facts, that are not actually, scientific/established facts.
It's easy-enough, through the rhetorical pathway, to weave a web of words, mutually-supportive, without a grounding in objective reality, or a "physical density" (as I have used the expression previously) such as guiding principles.
Thusly how the life of most in society is ordered, through the agreement over facts, and not the actual research itself. By agreement of 2 or more, we establish facts.
Cult of personality.
Technicians have a demeanor and interaction among ourselves, as we work on the problem, and bounce potential situations/solutions off one another. The folks who work on the actual real-world technical equipment, such as the antenna and detecting hardware have a language and lexicon that depends on actual hands-on experience.
When the technician explains to a customer the nature of the problem, the customer does not want a song and dance. The customer (you) want a clear, simple explanation of what is the problem, and what can be done to fix it.
This comes from my personal experience, on both sides of the desk. Technicians are terrible salepeople, because they don't have a monetary interest in your decision of what you purchase. We don't have a song and dance, because we give you a physical illustration of how it works. The "song and dance" is physically giving you the visual representation of how the technical process works. But what do we do when we lose you attention as we explain how the process works?
We simply want your problem solved, in the most efficient manner possible. The technician would, perhaps, like to improve your understanding of the process, so you are aware of the individual parts, and how the system(s) work(s).
The Technician wants you to take care of your property, your car, your phone, your whatever technical thing. We don't like to fix broken things. We like to do the periodic maintanence on a thing that keeps it operating optimally. This is why I take care of my property to the best of my ability. I want it to operate in the most tip-top condition. Accidents can't be avoided, true. Yet, what's coming from accident, and what problems are coming from ignoring the warning signs that something's wrong?
I approach the discussion on Schumann resonances the same way. I'm a technician, and always been one. I feel it's simply better to give you the facts, and data, and you can decide for yourself, the best, most optimal application for the facts.
Yet, humans need the song and dance...somewhere, in the successful transmission of data, in order for it to be meaningful.
The Disney-side, "Ascension-based" version has the necessary amount of song and dance, and fun colors to keep the humans interested; despite the lack of science and actual technical facts..
Lot's of phrases describe this process: the 'shuck and jive', the 'okee-dokee', '3 card monte', 'bait and switch', bamboozled, shanghaied, 'you been duped,' and on it goes. It exact number of phrases of how humans are swindled could be limitless. This is boilerplate Piscean-age antics.
Beware of "the con" in everything.
Pisces is the two fishes. One facing one way, the other below it facing the other way. It's extremely important for folks to start seeing the influence of the Piscean age, as we are exiting it.
Now the gravity of the immediate age is not so incipient, we can start to see what's happening. It's BECAUSE we are exiting Pisces Age, that is the "rush" to be woke.
Yet, 'woke' is still more of the cover of Pisces, looking to still stick around. The end is here...but no one is going silently, nor quietly. There is lots of stuff that was working fairly well, as it was, that's getting thrown under the bus.
There's alot of what I would call 'hardcore science' that's getting penalized by the folks who are looking for the fun, song and dance in the otherwise boring field of radio and broadcast.
There's a certain gravity of the population looking for the spectrogram to have a special spiritual and religious meaning, which it was never designed to have...nor is it possible to even build an "ascension energy" detector.
People use the phrase "ascension energy", although there is no truth to this phrase. There's not an agreement over the inherent meaning to that phrase. This phrase is merely a rhetorical gesture. This is no different from an inflexive "how ya doin'" when strangers meet.
This phrase is one of many that is used as a gesture for one to recognize his/her flock. The phrase tickles the ears.
This is one of those problems that people face, in looking for the correct, proper solution in this area. The use of gestural rhetoric, in place of meaningful dialog.
_
Patreon advanced version: ( https://www.patreon.com/posts/59116631 )
Commentaires