Thank you for being here. This group is continuously getting new members. I'd like to address this more towards the new-comers
It's important to understand that this group is the technical-side of Schumann resonances. There are multiple groups which use the name Schumann Resonances. We are not all the same.
I'm of the belief that we are all here to learn the truth, and that which is true. The Kybalion tells us that "all truths are half truths."
With humanity in third density, we occupy a world of polarity. A huge part of one's journey down here involves the resolution of polarity consciousness.
I have alot of formal training in electronics, computers (hardware and software), meters, gauges and related technologies. There is a soothing quality in learning the technical aspects.
The technology, engineering, facts, figures, have a reassuring quality. The predictable quality to the machinery, and detection is appealing.
Antennae are not given to dramatics, they work, and keep working, and don't argue how hard they're working. The antennae reveal a SPECTRUM of the truth. There is "truth" outside of what can be measured by the hardware.
It's my experience here, for the 3 years I've been involved in Schumann resonances, that the single biggest issue that people battle is over the area OUTSIDE of that which is detectable by the hardware.
The first principle to understanding the Schumann Resonances is that one needs to know the limits of the machinery, in its ability to detect a useful signal. The second most important principle is to understand the difference between local interferences, and that which is happening around the world.
Schumann resonances are a series of electromagnetic resonances which are primarily created by lightning discharges; they are the echoes of lightning, in other words.
There is a narrow range of detectable frequencies of Schumann resonances: ~4.5 - ~45.5 Hz. These frequencies are separated by a differential of 6.6Hz.
7.8 Hz is the fundamental frequency of this series. It does not stand alone, to represent Earth's heartbeat. This is the technical truth.
We can be assured by the veracity of this information. It's been measured, and validated through measurement. As I was told in 8th grade science class: "the numbers don't lie. The person reporting them may have lied, but the numbers don't."
I'm fairly certain that most folks have an understanding that numbers hold a degree of truth.
Yet, are we not mistrusting the veracity of the person giving us the information?
How many people are on the train that claims Tomsk is withholding important information. I'm not certain what the important information actually is; yet, this narrative does not fade.
It's funny how religious that people hold to the readings from Tomsk, yet are quick to claim malevolence. This is of course not everyone, but there's definitely a sub-set of individuals who maintain this type of narrative.
We are at the point of challenging those who bring forth actual research, and data.
Can I assure anyone that Tomsk is NOT hiding data?
Nope. I accept there are realities going on beyond what I am personally exposed to. I accept this as a fact, that I don't know everything. As a technician, I don't get the luxury of believing ion what I can't see.
Yet, the flip side of this is that there is no conclusive proof that Tomsk IS hiding anything.
Occum's razor tells us that the simpler explanation is to be preferred. Barring any extraordinary evidence, we can not accept an extraordinary claim as the most simple explanation.
This is our stalemate: There is not any credible, verifiable reports that Tomsk has performed with malfeasance. Barring any direct evidence, it's not a reasonable solution to insist that Tomsk is hiding, or manipulating data.
There is not a clear reason why any of the respectable scientists would be motivated to go through the rather difficult work of manipulating data. The data stream is set to run autonomously, so as NOT to allow for human fuckery, put simply.
With all this stated, people still have that need to challenge the veracity of the institutions reporting the results.
It must be so incredibly difficult to maintain the headspace to believe that all the data is questionable. It kinda hurts my head to hold onto all that malice, necessary to challenge the actual data result. To hold onto the circumstantial events that lead a person to challenge the actual result, seems like an unhappy state to be in.
Smart people usually are not happy people...we know what's wrong, and are able to do nothing about it.
Tomsk University.
The attached screen capture is of the current graph of the SR, as reported by Tomsk. The location of the site is Tomsk, Russia., at the Tomsk State University, Dept of Radioelectronics.
This is a technical university, which uses the hardware, as a part of their studies. They provide this information free to the public, as a charter for the school. They are legally required to provide this information; NOT because they feel it's some great service to humanity.
How to read the graphs:
The screen capture image is the complete report. There are four panels of data.
Top panel is the spectrogram. This single panel is the composite of the other three panels together. The panels below this are the dependencies.
A dependency is a data-set used to feed the spectrogram for analysis. The spectrogram (which gets labelled "the Schumann"), is a hardware device that does NOT measure the signal. An antenna does the actual measuring. The 'the Schumann' spectrogram is not a measuring device, but one that analyses the signal coming from the dependencies.
The following panels below the spectrogram are: Amplitude, Quality, Frequency.
Amplitude is the electric-side of the signal. Amplitude is Intensity, or strength of the signal. This is measured using a VU meter, registering deci-Bels of pico-electron-Volts. Amplitude is NOT a frequency. Amplitude is vertical conductivity.
Quality is the magnetic-side of the SR signal. Quality is measured as a horizontal vector Quality is the frequency component, as these are coherent waves. These waves are measured in units of Teslas. This is the measure of magnetic flux.
Frequency is the unit of measure of standard radio; of the measure of peak-to peak activity. The units of Frequency are Kilometers. These waves are the largest of all the atmospheric electromagnetics.
Ask Questions.
This subject is very complicated. There's alot of technical details to this, which need to get considered.
The true information of the technical side is difficult to comprehend, for those who are new to this.
I have been here in this group for over a year, and I've posted way more information than people need. Much of what I've presented has just been beyond what folks care about.
People want what they want, and that's all there is to it. If I want to have a dialog with folks, I need to open this up to your questions.
Language is difficult to get past. Once can grow spiritually, without the necessity of words...yet the logical head needs to feel a "part of." Getting the logical mind on track with the heart is the most important way for a person to make it through the difficult swam of truths and half truths.
I get my answers from Source, and my spirit Guides, and I'm fine with the answers. i don't need to go to humans for corroboration. I'm all set with my answers. But so what?
If I got all the answers, and no one to talk to, who cares how smart I am, or how true my truth is. People will gravitate towards what "sounds good", despite what's actually true.
"Truth is what looks right. Beauty is what feels right." Wisdom may be the combination of both those together, in equal measure.
It's less important to be smart, than it is to be wise. One can know the technical truth to the Schumann resonances, and yet, ultimately, it might not matter.
Trust the heart, it is the oldest and smartest organ of the body. the heart always knows.
Comments