Because this is the technical aspect of the atmospheric phenomena, I don't get the luxury of ignoring certain aspects of this community.
It is my job here to be technical, and to explain the science, and the accepted engineering of the detection of Schumann-series resonances.
THERE IS NO OTHER REASON FOR ME TO STILL BE ALIVE/occupying a physical chemical-based form. Whatever your life has in store for you, this is for you; it's not my pathway. Explaining the technical aspects is what I am supposed to be doing at this time. To explain this to the best of my ability is what's left. After this, I can be released. If yu're not interested in the technical aspects, that's fine...wish me well, and we can be done with any more word exchanges.
If the technical aspects are too much for you, or you want to argue that i'm withholding valuable information, because I'm sticking to the technical-side... then you should know that there is NO personal motivation to holdback on the technical explanations.
What are you able to comprehend?
Part of the problem is getting past the words used, to understand the concepts behind those words. This is the technical side to explaining the phenomena.
That others use the name Schumann resonances, and provide little actual data on this phenomena, is not a failing on our part.
The public has plenty of other places to discuss metaphysics, and the fantasy-side of the phenomena. The majority of places discussing Schumann resonances is giving you the fantasy-side version of this, because the technical side is so incredibly difficult.
The technical details of this is not misleading people; but the lack of understanding actual science and technology, is disillusioning the population.
Because it's my job to explain this technically, it's not my place to pull-out the rug under your belief system. You are fully free to your beliefs, without me/us trying to get you to change those views.
Yet, if you are basing your belief on science, and that science is not actually what is actually real; while one is simply making-up stuff to get the theory to work... then you are misleading yourself. You can have a belief that does not need science, and you'll be fine.
Yet, if you're basing your belief system on a science which is not real, but is a figment of your individual truth, then this is a house divided. To base a belief on science, and then be unable to take-in new information on this topic, is a recipe for failure, in our humble estimation.
If the facts, data, research we provide is causing you to seriously have problems with your belief system; as a result, you want to cuss me out, or say horrible things because the facts are not lining up with your assembled version of "science", then this is a huge problem for you.
I have no motivation to hide anything, or to mislead you. Misleading you creates horrid karma I would have to undo somehow. Invariably, this would involve more words, more exchanges with confused humans. I will do everything possible to avoid that.
You get the unblemished truth, so that I can move on to the next phase, that much quicker. Arguments and misinformation do not help me with my pathway.
Misleading others becomes an anchor to my forwards progress, and no one here is worth me being here longer than necessary.
Thank you for being here. Have a wonderful remainder of your day.
WHAT IS 'THE SCHUMANN' ?
Comparing 'the schumann' to the spectrogram. TOMSK SPECTROGRAM IS NOT "THE SCHUMANN";
What is "The Schumann" ?
Short answer: Who knows ?!
Longer Answer: Although this phrase is too commonly-used in the "Earth's-rising-vibrations"-based belief system of 'Ascensionism'; exists there does not such thing as "The Schumann."
This phrase is not found in Webster's dictionary. Nor is it found in Oxford's Dictionary Of English. This is not a phrase found in any scientific literature. One can not go to a clearing house of research and enter the phrase into a search engine, to return valid results. There simply exists no standard, technical definition of the phrase "The Schumann."
Yet, with the human condition, language underwrites all thoughts of the human. A definition or meaning is necessary to continue in the learning process.
There is a degree of fuckery inherent in the language, that allows for a wiggle factor, to conceal the innate meaning of a thought-form that is not well-developed; or a thought-form that is not grounded in an actual reality.
In other words, the language allows for a built-in distortion, or concealment of truth, behind personal perceptions.
WHAT'S THE ISSUE?
What is the problem with referencing the spectrogram as "The Schumann" ?
Primary Issue: "The Schumann" is pseudo-science, not rooted in scientific principles, or actual fact; while misrepresenting itself as legitimate science.
Part of "The Schumann" problem is one's innate understanding of a concept. Behind each phrase is a thought-form clear in one's mind: what clear picture does a person have in their head, associated with "The Schumann" ?
Part of "The Schumann" problem rests in the inability of the vocabulary itself not being able to convey the proper meaning. SR is radio, and invisible to the unaided eye; as such, a visual aid is necessary. Yet, in 'the schumann', what are the colors actually attached to?
Part of "The Schumann" problem is the fact that the word inherently is meaningless technically-speaking. It is one thing which has been misappropriated to represent something else, completely different. Due to the inherent fuckery of the phrase being introduced AS a means of confusion, continued use of the phrase is a continued walk along a pathway of confusion.
Part of the "The Schumann" problem is that belief itself has a power. Belief is fueled by the rhetoric we choose. How well do we know our own viewpoint, or the tenets of our belief? How often does additional facts, or data challenge our cherished beliefs?
Part of this issue is that beliefs don't need facts to be valid. Beliefs are not where facts go to become law. Yet, it seems important to bolster our deeply-held beliefs (which are invisible, unknowable) with actual facts, and objective validation.
It's simply my opinion that one should ideally come to understand SR simply for the fact of understanding the world in which we exist. Ascension is not based on an ability to understand SR. Ascension, as one has crafted the concept in the head is fine; without understanding the actual technical protocols of measuring SR.
However, if one feels the need to invoke the power and images of science for one's belief and mental well-being; then one needs to know what s/he is expousing. If one says that science is supporting their beliefs, then the science needs to be correct. You can not misappropriate the actual science and technology being used successfully elsewhere, for some alleged higher dimensional ideological crusade; at least, not without undesirable consequences attached to the deception.
Part of this issue is that the spectrogram is not a sensor device that measures anything. The Schumannists feel that their version of 'the schumann' [meaning spectrogram] is a receiver plugged directly into the atmosphere, without any signal processing, filtering, nor condition, nor is there a chain of electronic components in the process of plotting the image posted on Tomsk's servers, for public inspection.
Part of this issue is the assumed censorship when things go unexplainably wrong, or malfunction. They use an otherwise unexplained image to explain something which would not otherwise be able to be shown, nor visualized. Replacing a manufactured narrative for an outright fabrication.
Hard to believe, but there are more particulars to this list of issues; yet, this will suffice for is essay. Planck has been established.
HOCUS POCUS.
What is the measure of "hocus pocus" in your Belief ?
The phrase 'hocus pocus' is the root of the phrase "hoax". The phrase originates in the day's of a court jester, jugglers who would utter faux Latin phrases to give the air of casting an actual spell, during illusion ritual for the entertainment of the King. It's part of the casting of enchantments, used in beguiling an unsuspecting Royalty.
Intrinsically, there is no scientific, technical, nor established meaning behind the phrase "The Schumann". As a technical descriptor, it's useless.
Among other reasons, a primary problem is that it is uncertain what are the parameters phrase covers. It's simply your inferred understanding of the phrase 'The Schumann', that allows it to have significance.
Yet...what does "The Schumann" actually mean?
Phrase "The Schumann" is at this point, what amounts to religious ideology associated with the Religion of Schumannism, or the Cult of Ascensionism, perhaps.
The degree of religious devotion that people pay mind to--in their daily pilgrimage to the website to gather the "The Schumann" data for the day--might be considered to be a scrupulous religious practice.
That there is no standard definition behind "The Schumann" is what allows wonky ideology to be corrupted. Yet, this phrase appears all over the pages and videos of those who are looking to cash-in on their scrying of 'the schumann' glyph.
"The Schumann" is used as a tool for "technological scrying": reading a meter reading based on intuition and wishful-thinking.
Essentially, the main difference between 'The Schumann' and the spectrogram is the inclusion of supporting data; and how the visual representation gets transliterated (whether it is read, or interpreted.) It's my understanding the "The Schumann" gets channelled or interprated based not on the actual accepted science.
In order to know the difference between 'the schumann' and the SR spectrogram, it's super important to know what a spectrogram technically does. From there, we might apply this to the application of Tomsk, and SR in general
WHAT IS SIGNAL CONDITIONING ?
From the antenna detecting harware a line signal is fairly weak, so it needs to get amplified to a usable voltage.
From this, a filtering chain is used to remove unwanted noise from the system. Such noise may be a 50Hz peak in the surrounding environment from domestic power mains.
A direct signal is not possible to be fed directly into a spectrogram. There is a line-level impedance issue in the first place that needs to be rectified. The input microvoltage coming from the antenna hardware is not up to a usable line-level strength, so an amplifier needs to increase the signal strength fed to the spectrogram.
There is also a point of data storage on harddrive, which requires a cpu proccessing algorithm to track, maintain the data, alongside of the dependencies being detected.
PLOTTING THE SPECTROGRAM.
The information plotted on the spectrogram is: the dependency of the dipole antennae; the dependency of (usually 2) induction coils: one for N-S; one for E-W; the dependency of the frequency, which is the distance from peak to peak, in kilometers.
Each of these dependencies has 4 potential colors that might appear on the spectro-, based on the mode, or 'slope' (shape) detected by the hardware itself.
The spectrograph is plotting a 3 dimensional, spherical signal, on a planar surface; based upon the information received from the reporting dependencies. The signal data reporting by dependencies is the 'mode color information'. The mode color information is what gets fed into the spectrographic plotter; therefore creating the interesting set of patterns found on the finished plotting.
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT!
Spectrogram is not a reading from a meter, nor sensor, nor detector, nor antennae. The spectrograph is not reporting the actual data.
The spectrograph plots its images based upon the conditioned data coming-from the hardware itself; line graphs produced from the processing of the conditioned raw data = "Dependency".
The spectrograph creates a spectrogram, which is a useful tool for visualization; yet, it's important to remember that this image is a composite view to provide a convenient three-dimensional image. The plotted images of the spectrogram are scaled in resolution to fit the constraints of the actual scope screen.
THE SR SPECTROGRAM.
A Spectrogram analyses the data which is fed to it.
Analyses means to evaluate; Or, as is our case, to break-up, or disperse the incoming signal of the dependencies.
"A spectrogram is a visual representation of the spectrum of frequencies of a signal as it varies with time. When applied to an audio signal, spectrograms are sometimes called sonographs, voiceprints, or voicegrams. When the data are represented in a 3D plot they may be called waterfalls." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrogram)
It does not collect, nor measure, nor detect any information. Antenna hardware does the actual detecting of the physical environment. Antennae wire collects, or detects the actual environmental data, converting it into an electricdal impulse along an amplification and filtering chain.
These environmental signals become processed through the amp & filtering chain (conditioning) so as to become eventually intelligible to the spectrogram.
Conceptually-speaking spectrogram is a printer, which breaks-up a spectrum of light into constituent elements, based on dimensional ("slope") models, pre-set into the processing algorithm.
At no point is a spectrogram detecting, nor collecting data. This bit of machinery only ANALYSES data from an external (processing) source. [Common misunderstanding of The Schumannist's is the belief that the spectrogram receives the actual data from the atmosphere.]
The Spectrogram is a composite, plotted in colour, based upon the information from the reporting dependencies. This is one of the differences between "the Schumann", and the spectrogram. The spectrogram is plotting the signal
Schumann resonances are global electromagnetic resonances, generated by lightning discharges in the cavity between the Earth's surface and the ionosphere.
The cavity between the ionosphere and Earth ground is called a "waveguide." Schumann resonances bounce-off the Earth's surface; they are not generated FROM the Earth's interior. Lightning discharges are similar to striking a bell, which continues ringing.
This atmospheric resonance "hum" is that which is recognized by the antennae; therefore is that which is recorded on the spectrogram: subtle atmospheric resonances of the pico-range.
Spectrograph machines, in general, break-down a range of signals into constituent frequencies, or portions of the overall signal. With any spectrogram it's important to get the information of the dependencies. This is the signal after it has been filtered and conditioned; or, essentially, the raw data. .
For the sake of illustration, these graphs are reproducing a phenomena which is otherwise invisible. A little artistic license may be necessary, to decrypt the proper information appearing on the spectrogram.
FORMAT.
"Format: A common format is a graph with two geometric dimensions: one axis represents time, and the other axis represents frequency;
" a third dimension indicating the amplitude of a particular frequency at a particular time is represented by the intensity or color of each point in the image.
" There are many variations of format: sometimes the vertical and horizontal axes are switched, so time runs up and down; sometimes as a waterfall plot where the amplitude is represented by height of a 3D surface instead of color or intensity.
" The frequency and amplitude axes can be either linear or logarithmic, depending on what the graph is being used for. Audio would usually be represented with a logarithmic amplitude axis (probably in decibels, or dB), and frequency would be linear to emphasize harmonic relationships, or logarithmic to emphasize musical, tonal relationships. "
( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrogram)
[ Basic introductions to spectrogram:
(https://youtu.be/_FatxGN3vAM);
(https://youtu.be/YZTTmNYr6jA);
(https://youtu.be/OI3pIvLhVcc) ]
ORIENTATION.
On the left side of the graph is the resonance frequency, which starts at 0 in the top left corner. From there moving downwards, the numbers increase.
Running along the bottom of the graph is the measurement of Time. There are two sets of clocks. Immediately below the graph is a string of white numbers, which is Tomsk Local Time.
The larger yellow numbers (provided by Disclosure_news) below these are time in UTC.
[ UTC originates in Greenwich, England; stands for Universal Time Co-ordinated. (Tomsk is UTC+17; East coast US is UTC-5).]
The Spectrogram coloring is plotted from the reporting 12 dependencies, of Amplitude (Modes 1-4) ; Quality (Modes 1-4) ; Frequency (Modes 1-4);
"At rest, fair weather state" (theoretical 'zero state') is Dark Blue. Dark blue is our "canvas."
GAIA'S HEARTBEAT.
Tomsk Spectrogram is not showing Gaia's heartbeat, at all; let alone the notoriously presumed band at 7.8 Hz.
There is another circuit entirely that conducts power through the planet herself. This is the 'lower DC circuit' of the telluric grid of the geoelectric circuit.
The spectrogram is not a seismic meter. Its not an optical light sensor. It is not measuring telluric currents; nor is it recognizing UV-series light; nor Gamma bursts; nor X-rays.
The Schumann resonances are the product of lightning discharges between the upper DC - lower DC circuits; which continue to propagate as magnetic waves, which circle the globe; eventually oscillating in place to create the atmospheric resonances.
Information outside of set range of signals, gets filtered-out as 'noise'. Local interferences can impart a false signal on sensitive detectors. Active filtering is used to avoid a false local signal imparted upon the plotted images.
The "heartbeat" of the planet rests within the "chest" of the planet herself. Current is the magnetic-side of the EMF signal. Travels "electrically" as a direction such as North-South/East-West, in the nano-Tesla range.
EARTH'S GEO-ELECTRIC POWER GRID.
- Earth: A Battery
It is well-advised to consider the planetary sphere as a type of battery. Three main components of the "Earth battery" are: the Upper DC circuit; AC circuit; Lower DC circuit.
- "DC" is direct current; or moving in a straight line. "AC" is alternating current; or moving in a wave formation.
- Upper DC Circuit. This is Basically the IMF (Inter-planetary magnetic field) which links Earth to the Sun. This is the magnetosphere, and ionosphere together. The Upper DC circuit acts as a capacitor to hold a high voltage charge in the upper atmosphere. The amount of charge held here is between 200K-250K Volts.
- AC Circuit. This is the area between the upper DC circuit, and the Earth Ground of the planet herself. This is also referred-to as the "waveguide" in which the SR activates. Energy range of this circuit is pico-electro-Volt, and pico-Tesla.
- Lower DC Circuit. This is the Earth ground of the planet herself. The first primary layer of conduction is through the telluric currents. The water and soil of the planet conducts a current, which is the magnetic side of power, moving laterally through the planet herself. This is measured in nano-Teslas
- Insulator, or Electric "choke". Under normal conditions, the lower atmosphere is generally a fine-enough insulator between these two poles of the planetary battery; which are both measured in the nano-Tesla range of the spectrum.
- Battery poles. The upper DC circuit is one pole of the battery. The lower DC circuit is the other pole of the battery. SR come from the discharge between one pole to the other. Usually, it's the Upper DC to the Lower; yet, the flow might move in the opposite direction, from Earth to ionosphere.
__
original post: [schumann-resonances weblink: (https://www.schumann-resonances.com/post/june-2021-basic-introduction-how-to-read-the-schumann-resonance-spectrograph-properly )]
schumann-resonances weblink shareable: (https://www.schumann-resonances.com/post/04-june-2021-basic-introduction-essay)
wordpress: ( https://vertearbustosschumannresonanceharmonics.wordpress.com/2021/06/04/04-june-2021-basic-introduction-essay/ )
Schumann-Resonance-Harmonics Youtube channel link of the video : ( https://youtu.be/5sx_RBuG8tg )
Comments